Re: Prepare for a Ponyless Summer... Fall... and Winter...
edit: oh god why are there two "CompoundWord44" posters on the forums

-
Star Platinum
- Joined: May 04, 2011
- Gender: Male
Moderators: Perrydotto, Dexanth, Venusy, Wayoshi
SoundMonkey44 wrote:We need a collective Brony/Nerd Culutre mental health group online, I think we may be coming close to a boiling point to where a fair number of individuals in the community & just fanbases in general may go completly crazy soon. Mark my words in the coming years many of us may be in a mental ward.
...If so...anybody wanna be my roommate!?
Discord wrote:This news saddens me. But at least we are apparently getting 26 episodes:
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-hub ... fth-season
Headless Horse wrote:So kwitcher bellyachin' all y'all.
Wylie wrote:Also, I'm pretty sure anything that's said at a shareholders meeting is not considered a secret in any way, so anything you can share with us from that would be great!
Headless Horse wrote:The concerns about EqG/EqA aren't about taking away resources from FiM. They're about the FiM property being used as a springboard for a show that promotes some of the same harmful tropes and values that prevailed in the 80s and that FiM was specifically designed to break away from.
(Not taking a side here, just trying to frame what the argument is)
Wayoshi wrote:How are you able to attend, though? Is it a public event?
ShieldedDiamond wrote:I do have some in my name
Wayoshi wrote:How in the world did you get that? Is it easy? Why did you care to even get it?
InsertAuthorHere wrote:So we get to have at least eight months of endless crying and moaning about how the show is ruined?
SlateSlabrock wrote:Or you could, y'know, not flip out about dumb Internet opinions from dumb Internet sources, like we've told you many times before. 4chan is never going to be a balanced, reasonable view of the show.
InsertAuthorHere wrote:"Saying anything that's against the wall of doom and gloom means you're an apologist who doesn't deserve to be heard."
Wylie wrote:I own Disney stock, for example, which means I get a vote at the shareholder meetings. They send out a letter to let you vote by mail, usually pre-filled-out for the way they want the vote to go. (Or it's simply an authorization for you to allow someone there (usually a board member) to vote on your behalf, which amounts to the same thing.)
acksed wrote:What? That's the opposite of a vote.With the amount of shareholders, yes, it might be unwieldy, but a choice that is decided for you is no choice at all. Is this common? How many shares do you need before the decisions aren't made for you?
Star Platinum wrote:
edit: oh god why are there two "CompoundWord44" posters on the forumsI'm pretty sure I've been reading some of your posts thinking you're the same person.
Dexanth wrote:A quick analogy is think if every American citizen hypothetically could vote on any piece of legislation and your member of Congress asked for you to pass power onto them because it's more efficient for a delegate to do it.
Really it's kind of the same thing here.